Inspiration

Waymo's autonomous driving technology has the potential to serve people in many more cities, but each city brings different roads, weather, infrastructure, and driving patterns. We built CITYSHIFT to help identify those differences and prioritize what should be tested before launching in a new city.

We also thought about older adults who may feel nervous about riding in a driverless cab. Giving riders clear route choices, and explaining those choices, can make the experience more reassuring.

What it does

Search for a city, and CITYSHIFT compares its roads, weather, infrastructure, and local activity with selected Waymo benchmark cities. It shows where the biggest differences occur and turns them into ranked driving scenarios for teams to investigate and test.

City search → local differences → evidence → ranked test scenarios → briefing

  • City comparison: highlights the areas that differ most from Waymo's benchmark cities, with evidence for why each one stands out.
  • Ranked test scenarios: turns those differences into prioritized driving scenarios for teams to investigate.
  • Rider route options: compares routes using historical fatal-crash locations. Riders can see travel-time tradeoffs and choose a route with lower recorded crash exposure when one is available.
  • Agent-generated briefings: an agent in the app writes Markdown city briefings that summarize the findings and proposed scenarios. Waymo teams could use these to guide their own data collection, simulation, testing, and model training workflows.

How we built it

CITYSHIFT combines public datasets with Google APIs:

Public data

Google APIs

CITYSHIFT divides the area around the selected city into H3 hexagonal map cells and measures features such as intersections, road types, crossings, traffic signals, bike lanes, infrastructure, and weather. It compares those measurements with benchmark areas from Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Austin, and Atlanta.

We present the results on an interactive map, explain why each area stands out, and connect those findings to ranked test scenarios. The route feature uses historical crash locations to compare route options.

Challenges we ran into

  • Uneven data detail: Public datasets vary in detail and completeness. Roads and crossings can be tied to specific locations, while weather data covers a broader area.
  • Unusual ≠ dangerous: We had to make the results easy to understand without treating an unusual location as automatically dangerous.
  • History ≠ prediction: We were careful not to present historical crash data as a prediction of future safety.

Accomplishments that we're proud of

  • We turned public data into a clear path from city search → local differences → ranked testing scenarios.
  • Every highlighted area includes evidence explaining why it stands out.
  • We connected new-city planning with a rider-facing route experience and an agent that produces shareable Markdown briefings.

What we learned

Understanding a new city takes more than comparing citywide averages. Specific combinations of roads, weather, infrastructure, and activity create the scenarios that deserve attention. We also learned that showing the evidence behind each recommendation makes the results more useful for both engineering teams and riders.

What's next for CITYSHIFT

  • Expand the set of benchmark cities
  • Improve public-data coverage
  • Make the generated briefings easier to use in simulation and testing workflows
  • Improve the route experience for older adults with clearer guidance and more personalized preferences

Our goal is to help autonomous ride-hailing adapt to local conditions as it reaches more of the world.

Built With

Share this project:

Updates

Submission history