Time-Capture-Club entered field testing
The submitted Build Week artifact remains unchanged.
After submission, I used the Time-Capture-Club method to govern a read-only proof flight through My Decision Factory, one of my existing creative sites.
The flight tested whether TCC could:
- separate reported state from verified reality;
- preserve a working public site while inspecting it;
- make AI motion visible before the final receipt;
- distinguish discovering a defect from receiving authority to repair it;
- preserve uncertainty and a last-known-good state;
- return the next decision to the human operator.
What passed:
- the complete five-question public journey;
- portable decision-prompt generation;
- internal navigation and the exits to My Writing Companion and The Writing Room;
- preservation of the working site, local source, hosting state, and frozen Build Week artifact;
- production of a complete evidence packet, shortcomings ledger, receipt, and RETURN.
What failed or remains unverified:
- blank answers can still produce a falsely “ready” prompt;
- refresh clears the current draft;
- mobile and clipboard behavior require dedicated testing;
- local and deployed Git history differ;
- apex DNS and certificate behavior remain unresolved;
- the current site doctor validates the configured remote name, not remote reachability.
No patches were made during measurement.
The important result was not that everything passed. The system made failures visible, preserved the working aircraft, and stopped before repair authority was granted.
TCC did not prevent uncertainty. It prevented uncertainty from silently becoming action.
This is post-submission field evidence for a future TCC version. It is not a claim that the judges received a newer build.
Log in or sign up for Devpost to join the conversation.