Inspiration
Modern space missions generate massive streams of telemetry, logs, and alerts. However, incident response workflows remain heavily manual: engineers must triage anomalies, search historical incidents, and decide corrective actions under time pressure.
This project was inspired by a key operational gap: spacecraft anomaly response is slow not because of detection, but because of fragmented knowledge and decision latency.
We set out to design an AI agent capable of:
Detecting anomalies in mission telemetry
Retrieving similar historical incidents
Recommending and automating response actions
The objective is to reduce response time, improve consistency, and enhance mission safety.
How we built it
The system is structured as a modular AI operations agent: Telemetry ingestion layer Normalizes spacecraft telemetry, logs, and alerts. Anomaly detection module Identifies deviations from expected operational parameters. Incident retrieval engine Uses semantic search to find similar past anomalies and resolutions. Decision agent Recommends response actions based on historical outcomes and mission rules. Automation interface Executes predefined corrective procedures or generates operator-ready action plans. Simplified pipeline Telemetry → Anomaly Detection → Incident Retrieval → Decision Agent → Response Actions
Challenges we ran into
- Data structure and normalization Spacecraft telemetry varies widely in format and frequency. Creating a unified schema was essential for reliable detection and retrieval.
- Precision vs. automation risk False positives in automated responses can be costly. We implemented safeguards requiring human confirmation for critical actions.
- Knowledge retrieval accuracy Historical incident data often contains inconsistent terminology. Semantic indexing and embedding strategies were required to ensure relevant matches.
- Operational metrics definition Traditional ML metrics were insufficient. We defined operational KPIs: Mean Time to Triage (MTTT) Response consistency Incident recurrence reduction ## What we learned During development we gained insights in: Designing retrieval-augmented operational agents for high-stakes environments Structuring incident knowledge bases for semantic search with Elasticsearch Measuring operational impact using metrics such as triage time reduction and response accuracy Balancing automation with human-in-the-loop safeguards We also learned that in aerospace contexts, explainability and auditability are as critical as model performance.
Built With
- agents
- ai
- api
- automation
- cloud
- data
- docker
- elasticsearch
- embeddings
- fastapi
- for
- frameworks
- generation
- javascript
- langchain
- languages
- libraries
- linux
- openai
- platforms
- python
- retrieval
- retrieval-augmented
- rule-based
- safety
- search
- semantic
- tool-using
- vector
Log in or sign up for Devpost to join the conversation.