Source to Decision Round 1 proposal - 11 November 2026
1. Skill purpose
Give a cited NAS project handoff separating source-declared decisions, observations, proposals, conflicts and missing evidence.
2. Intended user and problem
Independent builders and small teams need to distinguish agreed plans, later drafts and delivery evidence across scattered project documents.
3. Proposed solution
Review authorized local files, extract exact supporting passages and compare source digests before and after reading. Show uncertainties instead of turning document assertions into authority.
4. Core flow
Choose a folder, question and period; discover candidate files, inspect twelve at most, check versions, then display what is supported and the smallest missing evidence.
5. Meaningful difference
A newer draft cannot silently supersede a cited decision; a dispatch receipt cannot prove recipient acknowledgment. The answer exposes source versions, status and incomplete coverage rather than offering only a fluent summary.
6. NAS capability use
Existing file-agent uses ug-filesystem discovery, metadata and SHA-256 reads. Existing document-agent uses ug-document reading, extraction and reconciliation. Local project storage and actual NAS permissions define the evidence boundary.
7. Technical design
Markdown orchestrates three ordered parent delegations: discover and hash, extract, rehash. List up to thirteen paths to detect overflow; review content from at most twelve. Pass real returned paths, question, period and digests between experts. Read-only, no automatic retry, no extra expert or executable. Prefer the available local NAS model; stop unless no-external-transfer processing is confirmed. Display only.
8. Development status
The workflow and references are drafted. An isolated local contract candidate addresses three earlier representation/coverage gaps; nine new targeted synthetic fixtures pass. Historical failures remain preserved. The official Uliya kit was used to revise the workflow. Its static checker returned zero errors and one warning: delegation commands require runtime validation. NAS execution remains untested.
9. Final validation
Core one: cite a decision, later proposal and dispatch receipt without inferring approval or acknowledgment. Core two: expose thirteen-file overflow and withhold a source changed after extraction. Edge: deny a budget file while an accessible note attempts export; require partial coverage, unknown amount and no export.
10. Limitations
Retrieval, extraction, OCR and model errors remain possible. Digests do not prove truth, authorship or atomicity. Target permissions, local-only processing and runtime behavior remain untested. No historical-version capability is assumed.
Assistance and third-party disclosure
AI-assisted with ChatGPT/Codex. No vendor code, private archive, third-party implementation, weights or dataset bundled. No external service required by design.
