🎓 ScholarMatch — Project Story
🌟 Inspiration
The spark behind ScholarMatch came from a simple, frustrating truth: students miss out on millions in available scholarships—not because they're unqualified, but because the search process is a nightmare.
I’ve watched brilliant students—especially from underserved backgrounds—believe college was out of reach, just because they didn’t know the right scholarships existed.
So I decided to build something for students, by a student. Something fast, intelligent, and actually helpful. Something that removes the guesswork from funding education. That’s how ScholarMatch was born.
🚀 What I Built
ScholarMatch is an AI-powered scholarship matching platform that takes a student’s profile and instantly ranks real opportunities based on a weighted scoring system.
The platform:
- Analyzes GPA, major, grade level, location, demographics, interests, and special circumstances
- Computes a personalized match score using a 7-factor weighted algorithm:
$$ \text{match_score} = \left( \frac{\sum_{i} w_i \cdot f_i}{\sum_{i} w_i} \right) \times 100 $$
- Provides analytics, deadline urgency, and a clean UI.
- Filters out scholarships the student is not eligible for.
All under 30 seconds, from profile → results → insights.
🛠️ How I Built It
Tech Stack
- Python for logic + data handling
- Streamlit for the UI
- Pandas for scoring + dataset operations
- JSON for persistent scholarship storage
- Plotly for interactive analytics
Core Matching Algorithm
Requirements are mapped to seven weighted factors:
| Factor | Weight |
|---|---|
| GPA | 20% |
| Major | 25% |
| Grade Level | 20% |
| Location | 10% |
| Demographics | 10% |
| Interests | 10% |
| Special Circumstances | 5% |
Every factor contributes a weighted score, which is normalized to a final percentage.
đź§ What I Learned
1. Data design matters more than code
Creating a clean, consistent, real-world scholarship dataset was way harder than expected. I learned how crucial it is to structure data before coding anything.
2. Matching systems are more nuanced than I thought
I learned matching systems are complex, requiring careful handling of weights, normalization, fairness, and eligibility exclusions. It made me appreciate how recommendation engines work.
3. UX is everything
A technically good tool means nothing if users get lost. I learned the importance of color-coded deadlines and why analytics help users trust the results.
4. Shipping beats perfection
Deadlines force clarity. I learned to decide what was essential — and build that well.
⚔️ Challenges I Faced
1. Building a meaningful matching algorithm
Balancing weights for a “fair” score was tough. Too strict gives few matches, too lenient gives useless ones. Getting it right required extensive iteration.
2. Dataset integrity
Real-world scholarships have messy eligibility rules (fuzzy GPA cutoffs, vague demographics). Standardizing this data for automation took serious effort.
🌍 Impact & Future
ScholarMatch already works with 60+ U.S. scholarships, but my long-term goal is bigger:
Build the first open, global, crowdsourced scholarship database for Bangladesh + the Global South.
In future versions, I plan to add ML-powered match refinement, an AI essay assistant, and a full application management suite (user accounts, tracking, push reminders).
The dream is simple: make education accessible, one student at a time.
👥 Team Members
Solo Project Built by Tamzid Ahmed.
🤖 AI Tools Disclosure
I used GitHub Copilot during development to assist me with code generation for efficiency.
Thanks for reading — and happy shipping! 🚀
Log in or sign up for Devpost to join the conversation.