Problem

How do you know what task deserves your attention next if you feel adrift during the pandemic? How do you know what to do first if you don't get the usual positive from your environment?

Solution

Imagine if you could be matched with your next task, the way Tinder matches you with a date? Then, the pressure to decide can be delegated to your app and give you the energy you need to make headway.

This can be simply done if the user could input a list of tasks and then spend 10 minutes to swipe tasks left and right to create rankings; rankings of Importance, Urgency and Time Cost. These rankings can then be used to calculate a recommendation for the user for what task should be done first.

This concept could be expanded in several direction, such as;

  • Allowing the user to change the category of "Time cost" to "Distance traveled" instead or a list of other categories (Difficulty, Complexity, etc).
  • Breaking up big tasks into multiple smaller tasks.
  • Adding game elements to keep the user engaged, such a streak multiplier for swiping cards at a good pace.
  • Collaborating on the same assessment of priorities with co-workers or a coach.

Impact

This app can demonstrate that people are not alone if they struggle to stay focused while working remotely. A lot of people are facing procrastination issues when they have to decide what to do for themselves, especially if private and professional life intermingle. This app will be a solution to avoid people from ruminating and procrastinating on their lack of a schedule. That in turn can help people steer away from mental health issues that may occur (depression, anxiety, panic).

This Weekend

We've spent this weekend sparring, pairing experts and people with attention deficit disorder to work out this problem and making adjustments to our proposed solution based on recommendations. The concept was validated by asking people online if this was something they would want and with psychologists to test our core assumption this would make decisions easier. Both answers were an enthusiastic "Yes".

When we confirmed we were on the right track, we created a paper prototype of the application and filmed it as you can see above. This paper prototype explains to developers what the use case would be.

What is left to do?

I asked my development partners how long it would take to develop a first proof of concept. The answer is approximately 15 hours. For the app to be market ready, we will need 80 to 90 hours.

After the Crisis

Secondary apps can be developed for specific use cases. The app may be used in psychotherapy or coaching, in order to assist the persons who are distressed by how distracted they are or find a direction they were previously lacking.

Share this project:

Updates

posted an update

Since the hackathon has concluded, I've been in contact with a mathematical psychologist and it appears that there is already solid science on this type of sorting. So I'll be doing some extra reading to see what more I can learn.

For now, we know that the sortation is potentially complex, depending on methodology. I'll have to brush up on some mathematics to see if I can come up with something.

Log in or sign up for Devpost to join the conversation.

posted an update

Originally, we intended to allow the user to add a free number of categories to rank their tasks on. Based on the recommendation of G. Oana Costea, we scaled back to three categories to make sure the app wouldn't become a source of procrastination. We concluded based on experience that any third category should be associated with ease/difficulty (such as; simplicity/complexity, pleasing/displeasant, time consumption, energy consumption, distance, etc), since many recommendations would be based on starting with the easy or difficult tasks first.

We tested a comparison with filling rating questions ("how important do you rate this task?") compared to our individual sorting method ("which of these two tasks is more important?"). It turns out that there is a break-even point at 22 tasks at which rating questions and the individual sorting method takes the same amount of time, but the individual sorting method will deliver a much more granular result.

In the recommended time of filling a normal survey (20 minutes), users should in theory be able to rate 53 tasks across three categories.

Log in or sign up for Devpost to join the conversation.